The Power of Expertise: The Census Bureau Welcomes New Census Scientific Advisory Committee Members

 

The U.S. Census Bureau recently announced the appointment of five new members to its Census Scientific Advisory Committee (CSAC). These distinguished professionals bring diverse expertise from fields like sociology, economics, disability research, and computer sciences to tackle critical challenges in census operations and data management.

Meet the New CSAC Members

The new appointees include:

Kristine J. Ajrouch: Research professor at the University of Michigan, focusing on group dynamics.

Sara Curran: Professor at the University of Washington with expertise in international studies, sociology, and public policy.

Andrew J. Houtenville: Economics professor and director of the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire.

Bonnielin K. Swenor: Endowed professor of Disability Health and Justice and director of the Disability Health Research Center at Johns Hopkins.

Jonathan Ullman: Associate professor at Northeastern University's Khoury College of Computer Sciences.

These new members will help shape the future of census programs, policies, and operations.

Why the Census Scientific Advisory Committee Matters
The Census Scientific Advisory Committee (CSAC) was established to address emerging challenges in census operations, including adaptive design, cybersecurity, and statistical research. The committee also provides guidance on the application of scientific advancements in various fields like:

• Survey methodology
• Geospatial and statistical analysis
• Cognitive psychology
• Econometrics
• Business operations
• Computer science

CSAC’s insights influence many aspects of Census Bureau activities, ensuring data accuracy and operational efficiency.

A Rich History of Advisory Excellence

The Census Bureau’s advisory tradition dates back to 1994 with the formation of the Census Advisory Committee of Professional Associations (CACPA). Re-chartered as CSAC in 2010, the committee now comprises up to 21 members from diverse disciplines.

CSAC has been instrumental in guiding landmark Census Bureau programs, including the decennial census, demographic studies, and economic surveys. The committee’s recommendations have shaped data collection techniques, statistical accuracy, and the accessibility of information for public use.

Accessing Census Bureau Information

The Census Bureau values transparency and public engagement. Access key materials from past CSAC meetings, including agendas, minutes, public comments, and recordings, to learn more about their work and recommendations. Stay informed about future meetings of the 2030 Census Advisory Committee. Meeting dates, agendas, and materials are regularly updated on the Census Bureau website.

• Access Census Bureau Response to Committee Recommendations (2018-Present)
• 2030 Census Advisory Committee Future Meeting Dates: [NOTE:  The future meeting dates could change due to unforeseen circumstances.  Should a change be necessary, updates will post as soon as possible.]

• Access the meeting agenda, meeting minutes, public comments and meeting recordings: 
  2024

Take a moment to explore the wealth of knowledge and resources available to us through their groundbreaking efforts.

[By Anna Xiong, Kelley Center]

New Government Resource for Researching Civil Rights

The National Archives and Records Administration has recently released the first documents in what will soon be a database of Civil Rights Cold Case Records.  Following the passage of the  Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act in 2019, previously unavailable civil rights cold cases from 1940 to 1979 will be made digitally accessible to the public.  The records will be released on a rolling basis and those released are currently available at the National Archives Catalog.  Eventually NARA will create the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Portal which will allow direct access to the information.  

The first records released concern the case of Hattie Debardelaben, a 46 year old Black mother and grandmother from Mulberry, Autauga County, Alabama.  On the night of March 23, 1945, white police officers conducted a warrantless search of Debardelaben's home, looking for bootleg whiskey.  The officers beat and arrested Debardelaben and her son.  Debardelaben died of her injuries in the back of the police car en route to the Prattville County Jail.  A coroner's inquest found that the officers had no legal responsibility in her death and no arrests have ever been made or trial held.

According to the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Act, records will be reviewed by the Civil Rights Cold Cases Review Board, which designates the records for potential digitalization and public access.  The release of the records is the result of a multi-year collaboration among the review board, the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  

The Archivist of the United States, Dr. Colleen Shogan stated, "The release of these records, and the many more to come, will hopefully help foster a deeper understanding of our nation's civil rights history, provide friends and family transparency and closure, and help those impacted claim justice."

Hattie Debardelaben

Government Information Resource: USGS (United States Geographical Survey) and the National Land Cover Database

According to its website, the USGS “monitors, analyzes, and predicts current and evolving Earth-system interactions and delivers actionable information at scales and timeframes relevant to decision-makers. [They] are a primary Federal source of science-based information on ecosystems, land use, energy and mineral resources, natural hazards, water use, and availability, and updated maps and images of the Earth’s features available to the public.”

The newest product released by the USGS is its updated and improved National Land Cover Database or Annual NLCD.  Unlike the previous version of the NLCD, which mapped land cover from 2001 to 2021 in two or three-year increments, the new version maps land cover from 1985 to the present in one-year increments.  It will be updated annually. 

The Annual NLCD contains six products:

1.       Land Cover – This dataset provides 16 land cover classes such as deciduous and evergreen forest, grassland, cultivated crops, and developed.

2.       Land Cover Change – These data represent annual land cover changes from one year to the next.

3.       Land Cover Confidence – This layer provides confidence levels for the land cover classifications.

4.       Fractional Impervious Surface – This component provides the proportion of land covered by developed surfaces, such as roads and rooftops.

5.       Impervious Descriptor – This feature offers additional information about impervious surfaces by distinguishing between roads and other built surfaces.

6.       Spectral Change Day of Year – This attribute captures the specific day of the year when significant changes in surface reflectance occur.

The Annual NLCD uses “the extensive Landsat satellite data record at a 30-meter resolution” and employs data from as far back as the early 1980s.  To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, the USGS meticulously reviews thousands of 30-meter plots and annually classifies and validates the data.

All of this data will be available to private individuals and companies, to members of the general public, and to academics and scholars.  The data may be used in various areas and for various interests, such as management and modeling of resources.  The data allows for assessing changes in the ecosystem, biodiversity, climate, surface and groundwater quality, wildlife, and other areas.  Wildfire threats, urban heat risks, and biological carbon sequestration can be modeled. These analyses provide more accurate and timely information for conservation efforts and land management. 

For more information on the Annual NLCD Collection 1.0, including how to access the data, visit the USGS website:https://www.usgs.gov/annualNLCD.

Election Day

 Election Day is less than a month away on Tuesday, November 5th!

There will be a polling location on Rice campus, at the Welcome Center, 7 am-7 pm. All voters registered in Harris County can vote here. Be sure to bring your government-issued ID.

Early voting begins October 21^st and ends November 1^st.

Approved early voting sites can be found here at Vote-Centers. (Election Day sites can also be found here.)  Ride the Rice BRC/TMC Shuttle to the closest Early Voting site (shuttle stop 12).

If you are voting in Harris County, view your voter-specific ballot at Whats-on-my-Ballot.

There are other important races and issues voters will decide on this year, including US Senate and Representative, Texas State Senator and Representative, Railroad Commissioner, and numerous judges and county officials.  Harris County also has three separate bond proposals to be voted on. We hope you will make your voice heard today.

For non-partisan information about candidates and issues, League of Women Voters Guides for Harris County are available in the Kelley Center for Government Information in the basement of Fondren as long as supplies last.  The Guide can also be found online here.   

The Houston Chronicle 2024 Texas Voter Guide provides sample ballots for Harris and Houston area counties along with information about each candidate.  They also post their endorsements in many races. (The Houston Chronicle is available to members of the Rice community.  Rice students, faculty, and staff: please visit https://library.rice.edu/houston-chronicle for instructions on registering for a free Houston Chronicle account.)

For a more comprehensive list of election resources, access the Kelley Center’s Voter and Election guide. 

For example, if you want:

for information about a candidate's biography, voting record, positions, ratings, speeches, and funding, check Project Vote Smart.

to see where candidates stand on a host of issues, check ProCon.org's Presidential Election site.

for information about campaign contributions, check the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and/or OpenSecrets.org.

for general information on evaluating candidates for public office, check USA.gov's Choosing Candidates to Vote for.

 

Public Feedback Sought for Congress.gov

If you want current information on the federal legislation that is accurate and official, the best site to use is Congress.gov. 

Congress.gov is a collaboration among the Library of Congress, the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Government Publishing Office. The site is searchable and free and provides the status, full text, and summary to each bill before Congress. It also provides direct links to the Congressional Budget Office which analyzes the cost estimates of each bill. The Congressional Record (which provides a daily transcript of speeches and actions of Congress) provides the process of the bill through Congress. The site gives access to the entire Congressional Record back to its first publication in 1873. Background information on the site are profiles of each member of Congress, legislative process videos, Committee profile pages, historic access to previous bills, and previous public forums. 

Once a year, in September, the Library of Congress conducts a public forum to educate the public and to gather feedback on the site. The next public forum has been scheduled for Wednesday, Sept. 18 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET. 

If you would like to attend the forum virtually here is the registration link. If you are lucky enough to be in Washington and can attend in person at the beautiful Library of Congress, register here. 

The forum will present enhancements to Congress.gov based on previous user feedback. It will also show how “legislative information is gathered and made available to the public.” There will also be Q&A discussion segments where attendees can learn about the site and share ideas for future enhancements. Those who cannot attend can also submit suggestions before and after the forum at Congress.gov Public Forum Survey Form.

From the Library of Congress: The Library of Congress is the world’s largest library, offering access to the creative record of the United States — and extensive materials from around the world. It is the main research arm of the U.S. Congress and the home of the U.S. Copyright Office. Explore collections, reference services and other programs and plan a visit at loc.gov; access the official site for U.S. federal legislative information at congress.gov; and register creative works of authorship at copyright.gov.

The Best of Both Worlds or Between a Rock and a Hard Place

The United States Postal Service is a strange hybrid. 

It was established by the First Continental Congress in 1775.  The new federal government established in 1789 established the postal service permanently as a government agency in 1792.

Therefore:

The USPS is a government agency within the Executive Branch. 

Its service standards are set in the Code of Federal Regulations, and the Postal Regulatory Commission has oversight of it.

It has a public mission, and the price of minimal service must remain affordable.

It maintains a monopoly of mailboxes and letter delivery to be able to provide service to communities that would not be financially viable for a private company.  Only the USPS can deposit items into mailboxes. 

As a government agency, the USPS is exempt from tolls, vehicle registration fees, state/local taxes, property/real estate taxes, and parking tickets for delivery vehicles.

To fund growth and improvements, the USPS is granted very low interest loans.

Postal workers are federal employees.  The USPS assumes all financial risks for workers’ compensation from its revenue.  It cannot use a private insurer.

Postal workers cannot strike.

 

However:

Since the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, the USPS does not receive appropriations from Congress provided by tax revenues. Unlike most government agencies, it is almost completely financially independent. 

It is required to act like a private business and must compete for customers.

The rise in costs of providing services, especially employee retirement benefits, competition from other delivery companies, and a reduction in need for the postal service because of technological innovations for delivery of communication (email, etc.) has led to a loss of revenue for the USPS. 

Currently the cost of universal mail service is higher than the monetary value of having a monopoly.

Other handicaps:

USPS has more flexibility in purchasing than other government agencies, but purchasing is regulated by government oversight and is not as flexible as a private company would have. 

The USPS is forbidden by law from putting retirement program monies into any but the most secure investments.  Therefore, the cost of retirement benefits for postal employees is higher than the money the investments make. 

The amount the USPS can borrow for growth and improvements is capped by law, and the cap has not changed in 30 years.

Because of its hybrid nature, the USPS has some control over it’s operations and low to no control over others.  For example, USPS has no control over providing 6-day service.  It also has no control over its ability to diversify products and services.  It has high control over the prices it charges for services it competes with other companies to provide such as package delivery.

The US Postal Service component of the Office of Inspector General has studied the tension between the competing natures of the Postal Service as a privately funded entity and a government agency and in a white paper released August 2, 2024 has determined that its current structure is not sustainable and needs reform. 

 

Copyright and AI

“AI raises fundamental questions for copyright law and policy, which many see as existential. To what extent will AI-generated content replace human authorship? How does human creativity differ in nature from what AI systems can generate, now or in the future? What does this mean for the incentive-based foundation of the U.S. copyright system? In what ways can the technology serve as a valuable tool to amplify human creativity and ultimately promote science and the arts? How do we respect and reward human creators without impeding technological progress?” 

                                         Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights 

Because of the disruptive nature (i.e., an innovation that significantly alters the way that consumers, industries, or businesses operate) of AI generated materials, the US Copyright Office has been studying the effects of AI on the role of copyrights and devising policies and procedures for dealing with those effects. 

On March 16, 2023 the Copyright Office launched the New Artificial Intelligence Initiative to address, among other things, the copyrightability of works produced by AI and the use of copyrighted materials in creating data sets that “train” generative AI, which they define as “an application of AI used to generate outputs in the form of expressive material such as text, images, audio, or video. Generative AI systems may take commands or instructions from a human user, which are sometimes called ‘prompts.’” 

In August of 2023, the Copyright Office published in The Federal Register a Notice of Inquiry requesting comments and information from the public addressing these issues. Comments were accepted through December 6, 2023. 

From their study, which will incorporate these public comments and information, the Copyright Office intends to publish their report Copyright and Artificial Intelligence which will make recommendations for policies within the Copyright Office and to Congress for establishing copyright laws. 

On July 31, 2024, the Copyright Office published the first part of the report, Part 1: Digital Replicas. This first part of the report deals with the proliferation of videos, images, and audio recordings that “digitally created or digitally manipulated to realistically but falsely depict an individual.” The report concluded that these unauthorized replicas threaten the entertainment industry, the political arena, and private individuals. It recommends Congress pass laws for protection from these replicas and defines the scope these laws should take in reference to “what kinds of replicas it should cover, whom it should protect, the term of protection, liability, licensing and assignment, First Amendment concerns, potential remedies, and the statute’s relationship to state law.” The recommendations do not include protections for an artist’s “style.” 

No dates have been announced yet for the forthcoming parts of the Report. One can follow the progress of the study and the reports on the Copyright Office AI webpage.